Submitted by Collin Berglund on April 16, 2012
BUT WHERE ARE THE SOLUTIONS? When the lame-duck hits, there need to be options on the table. Regardless of what you think of Rep. Paul Ryan's (R-WI) and President Obama's budget proposals, the fact is that each are partisan -- and thus not viable says Judd Gregg, who writes about another possible solution:
Judd Gregg for The Hill: Let Bowles, Simpson finish their job
WHAT CONGRESS IS ACTUALLY DOING: Instead of looking at solutions like Gregg's that might have a chance of passing, Republicans and Democrats alike are focused on Election Day. Republicans want to help small businesses. Democrats want to make sure the wealthy pay their fair share to relieve the burden on the middle class. At least that's the narrative each party is trying to peddle:
Seung Min Kim for POLITICO: Hill girds for tax-bill battle
IN THE MIDDLE: "Swing voters have views; they are just not views that all come from any one party’s menu," Bill Keller writes. They are not looking for a checklist of empty promises, but "a problem-solver, a competent steward, someone who understands them and has a convincing optimism." Agreed:
Bill Keller for The New York Times: The Sweet Spot
ACTION OF THE DAY: Talk to one friend, co-worker or family member today about No Labels and ask them to join our movement by signing up for action alerts at
nolabels.org.