Join Today and Receive a Free Bumper Magnet

Can problem-solvers control November?

By Linda P. Campbell

August 8, 2012

Are you a NObama voter?

Or will you say Mitt-No! in November?

You might not have heard, but the difference-makers in the presidential election this year will be PSVs: problem-solving voters. You know, people who'd like Washington and those we send there to actually work for a change.

So says Mark McKinnon, a political strategist who in his time has helped former President George W. Bush, Sen. John McCain and the late Texas Gov. Ann Richards.

McKinnon blogged about PSVs back in June based on a poll of 1,000 voters conducted for a not-well-enough-known group he helped found with the engaging name of "No Labels." (nolabels.org/blog/problem-solving-voter)

Polls, to me, are for sway-with-the-wind politicians. What intrigued me wasn't so much the results of that survey but the message No Labels is promoting.

I was introduced to the group recently through a huge envelope that I initially took for junk mail. Inside was a 10-by-10 booklet shouting "Make the presidency work!" on the cover, with tiny cartoonish characters holding signs that added "because it can!"

This actually is a follow-up to "Make Congress Work!" an earlier prescription for cutting down on some of the infernal nonsense practiced by elected representatives who demonstrate little evidence of actually earning what we taxpayers are paying them.

No Labels is reaching out to people who want politicians to put problem-solving ahead of point-scoring, to "stop fighting and start fixing." The group advocates more powerful incentives for our leaders to do the right thing, to counter the incentives (campaign donations, opposition threats) for them to choose destructive partisanship over the public interest.

Co-founders come from across the political spectrum, and they have experience as elected officials, Washington staffers, philanthropists, activists, academics and business leaders.

I can't say I embrace all their ideas, but these are some of the best:

Don't pay members of Congress if they don't pass spending bills on time. No more of this business of operating by continuing resolutions adopted at the last minute. They should make hard choices and meet deadlines, the way the rest of us have to live.

Make everyone operate from the same facts. Instead of Republicans and Democrats picking and choosing the numbers that back their own proposals for the nation's finances, have a nonpartisan authority like the Comptroller General give a televised public presentation to a joint session of Congress, then have a rational policy debate based on a common set of data.

Have the president stand regularly for "question time" before Congress the way the British prime minister does. It could get raucous and tense, but also be revealing. It also would allow the public to see the president and the people's representatives debate each other face-to-face instead of through dueling press conferences.

Improve the appointment process. With more than 1,000 federal positions requiring presidential nomination and Senate approval, even completely noncontroversial nominees can get chewed up by delays in the process. Senators too often hold up votes strictly for partisan reasons, leaving individuals in limbo without justification. Nominees should be confirmed or rejected within 90 days. If the Senate doesn't vote within that time, a nominee would be confirmed by default.

Here's a factoid: Democrats and Republicans in Congress worked together to streamline appointments by reducing the number of presidential appointments that require Senate approval, jobs such as chief scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, commissioner for education statistics and Housing and Urban Development's assistant secretary for public affairs. That legislation, S. 679, went to the president Aug. 2. (1.usa.gov/NjPdtm)

No Labels says more than half of American voters are looking for problem solvers over party affiliators. If only November's results would prove that true.

http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/08/08/4166558/can-problem-solvers-cont...

 

Related Posts

  • February 21, 2012
     
    The problem with Congress is not the people. It’s the outdated rules, procedures and traditions that govern the institution and make it impossible to get things done. Any rule changes will require a push from the outside. Congress won’t fix itself. But citizens can do something to end the gridlock.
  • September 12, 2012
     
    When did governing our nation become more like sport, with a focus on beating the opponent with ESPN-styled media coverage? Do the parties of “no” and “my way or the highway” no longer represent your personal values and principals? Do you remember when collaboration and compromise were good traits to have as a politician? Do you believe the only pledge politicians should make is to uphold the Constitution, rather than upholding a separate agenda such as the Norquist Tax Pledge? If you answered yes to one or more of these questions and want to be part of the solution, consider supporting the group “No Labels.”
  • June 28, 2012
    No Labels Press
    This week Rep. Marsha Blackburn became a co-sponsor of the No Labels-backed No Budget, No Pay Act (H.R. 3643/S. 1981), which will suspend pay for members of Congress if they fail to pass a concurrent budget resolution and all 12 annual spending bills on time.

Use the Toolkit

Citizen Toolkit

Click here to get all the tools you need to help make America work!

Use Toolkit

Problem Solvers

  • Andy Barr
  • John Barrow
  • Mark Begich
  • Ami  Bera
  • Sanford Bishop
  • Diane Black
  • Bruce Braley
  • Julia Brownley
  • Larry Bucshon
  • Cheri Bustos